Xera Lab
Dental case management platform
Read the case study →
A slow app, a platform nobody can safely change any more, or a developer who stopped replying. We start by reading what exists and giving you a written verdict — fix it, refactor it or rebuild it — so the decision is yours and it rests on evidence instead of a sales pitch.
Nobody can price a rebuild honestly without reading what is already there. So the first piece of work is a review, and what you get out of it is a written document: what the code does well, what is actually wrong, what it would take to fix, and what it would take to replace.
The document is yours. If it says the right move is to repair what you have, that is what it says, and you can hand it to your current developer and never speak to us again. That has to be a real possibility or the review is worthless.
The review is scoped and priced on the free call, in writing, before it starts — like every other piece of work here. You can stop when you have the document.
The most common damage in an abandoned project is not the code. It is that the App Store account, the Google Play listing, the domain, the hosting and the database sit in someone else's name, and that someone is not answering.
Part of taking a product over is putting all of it back in your name, and keeping it that way. Every account we create for you is created as yours from the start — that is the standing rule here, not a concession for rescue work.
Once you have decided, the work runs like any other project: a fixed price in USD, three or four milestones, working software you can open at each one, and nothing invoiced until you accept it.
A rescue usually starts with stabilising what is live — stopping the bleeding — before anything is improved. Users do not care that a rewrite is coming; they care that the thing is broken today.
Twelve months of free support follows launch, exactly as it does on a new build.
Not necessarily, but it changes the answer. The first step is establishing what you actually control — the store listings, the domain, the database, the hosting — because those often matter more than the code. If the code is genuinely gone, a rebuild is the only honest route, and we will tell you that plainly rather than bill you to find out slowly.
It is a fair suspicion, so the verdict is written and it shows its reasoning. If repairing is cheaper, the document says so and explains why, and you are free to take it to your current team. We would rather lose a rebuild than be the studio that recommends one to everybody.
Yes, where they are still involved and willing. A review is not an accusation — plenty of code is reasonable work that simply outgrew its original scope, and the fastest route is often to tell the existing developer exactly what to change.
The review is a matter of days. The work after it starts from two weeks for a stabilisation and runs to a full build timeline for a genuine rebuild — you get a milestone plan with a date before anything begins.
Yes. Send yours before the call, or we will provide a simple mutual one. Reading a private codebase without one is not something we would ask you to agree to.
Tell us what exists and what is going wrong with it. You get a written answer on whether to fix it or replace it — and the document is yours either way.